← Journal
Content

Sounding human when you’re a stretched team

When you’re a stretched team, the way you talk to your audience is usually the first thing that suffers — and the fix isn’t to write more, it’s to let AI take the drudgery of communicating while you keep the voice. The trap to avoid is the opposite: handing your whole tone to a chatbot and ending up sounding like every other beige business on the internet.

The two failure modes

When you’re flat out, your communications fail in one of two ways.

The first is going silent or going stiff — newsletters that read like a council notice, social posts that sound like a fax machine wrote them. That’s what happens when comms is the eleventh job on a ten-job day.

The second is newer and sneakier: you discover AI can write, so you let it write everything, and within a month your warm little community organisation sounds exactly like a mid-tier SaaS company. All the edges sanded off. All the personality gone. Technically fine, completely forgettable.

Both lose the thing that made people choose you in the first place: that there was a recognisable human on the other end.

Sounding human is mostly about specifics

Here’s the unglamorous truth about sounding like a real person: it’s not about clever phrasing. It’s about specifics that only you would know. The dog that comes to the office. The thing a customer said last week. The bus route that changed and stuffed up your attendance. AI can’t invent those — and it shouldn’t try.

So the division of labour is simple:

  • You bring the specifics and the opinion. Three messy sentences about what actually happened, in your own words. Even just bullet points.
  • AI does the lifting. Tidies the grammar, fixes the structure, drafts the version for the newsletter and the shorter one for socials.
  • You read it back and put the human bits back in. AI will quietly delete your best line because it’s “off-topic”. That line is usually the whole point. Restore it.

A real detail and an honest opinion beat a thousand polished words that anyone could have written.

A worked example

Say a community centre wants to thank volunteers after a busy weekend. The stretched-team default is either nothing, or a generic “Thank you to all our wonderful volunteers!” that lands like wallpaper.

The humane version: the coordinator types, “Massive weekend, 40 people through the door, we nearly ran out of chairs, Margaret stayed back two hours to clean up and I want her recognised.” AI turns that into a warm, readable post in two minutes. The coordinator adds the chairs detail back in because AI thought it was unimportant — and that chairs detail is exactly what makes it feel real. Five minutes, genuinely human, and it actually sounds like that place.

The neurodivergent angle, because it’s mine

I’ll be honest about why I care about this. Writing under pressure is hard for a lot of people, me included — a blank page when you’re overwhelmed is its own kind of paralysis. AI as a first-draft un-sticker is one of the kindest uses of it I know. It gets you off zero. But the thinking, the warmth and the opinion still come from you. That’s not a limitation to apologise for; it’s the entire value.

If your comms have gone quiet or gone robotic, the answer usually isn’t “write more” or “let the AI run it”. It’s a small workflow where the machine does the lifting and you stay the voice. If you want help setting that up so it actually saves you time, that’s exactly the kind of thing we’ll happily map out with you.

Want to see which writing drudgery AI could take off your plate?

Message a real person — plain English, no bots, no pitch. We’ll tell you honestly whether AI can help, and where it can’t.

Or look closer: See what AI could take off your plate →

“Aaron walked our non-techy staff through it so we can manage it ourselves.” — Jessica Hill, Interplast Australia & New Zealand

The Monday read

One plain-English way to get an hour back — from Aaron, every Monday. No hype, no spam, unsubscribe in one click.